You are browsing the archive for 2011 January.

Trying alternatives to delicious

January 13, 2011 in Tech Talk

Image representing Diigo as depicted in CrunchBase
Image via CrunchBase

Late last year, news leaked that Yahoo! might be shuttering delicious.com, the social bookmarking service that it acquired earlier. It’s not the first service Yahoo! has killed after spending money to acquire it (jumpcut.com was my first experience with this phenomenon). Apparently, Yahoo! has since said that it is seeking a buyer for delicious.com.

In the meantime, I’ve been trying out diigo.com, which is similar to delicious, but has some other features going for it as well. I’ve already imported all my bookmarks from delicious (a relatively painless process, I might add), and started using it to post the “Items to Read” posts here on the blog.

From the diigo website:

Diigo provides a browser add-on that can really improve your research productivity. As you read on the web, instead of just bookmarking, you can highlight portions of web pages that are of particular interest to you. You can also attach sticky notes to specific parts of web pages. Unlike most other web “highlighters” that merely clip, Diigo highlights and sticky notes are persistent in the sense that whenever you return to the original web page, you will see your highlights and sticky notes superimposed on the original page, just what you would expect if you highlighted or wrote on a book!

Moreover, all the information — highlighted paragraphs, sticky notes, and the original url — are saved on Diigo servers, creating your personal digest of the web, your own collection of highlights from the web – ones that are meaningful to you! You can easily search, access, sort and share this collection from any PC or even iPhone.

For those who are looking for an alternative to delicious, it’s worth a try, and the basic features are free to use, unlike some other alternatives that are out there. And if you’re interested in following my links on diigo, I’m Scmurley.

Thanks to Megan Taylor for the cue to check out this service.

Enhanced by Zemanta

CICM Interview: Rusty Lewis on new CP5 advertising options

January 13, 2011 in College Media News, College Publisher

collegepublisherIn the wake of College Media Network‘s announcement in late December that they were changing their business model, most of my attention focused initially on the fee structure that would exist for current and new clients. See interview here. Now, I turn attention to the second part of the announcement, the change to the College Media Network ad revenue sharing structure. Here’s the part that deals with the advertising revenue splits.

Newspapers will have more choice with managing online ad inventory by selecting one of the following on an annual basis:

A. CMN and the newspaper will share the inventory among all 5 ad units with a 70/30 breakdown.  The newspaper will be able to utilize each ad placement up to 30% of the page impressions.  Each party will retain 100% of the revenue made off the campaigns placed on the site, but any unused inventory on the newspaper-side will be filled with remnant ads (of which the newspaper will receive 20% of the revenue).

B.
CMN will sell all 5 spots and remit a payment of 20% of the total revenue to the newspaper.

C. The newspaper can buy the entire inventory from CMN at a rate of $7.50 per 1,000 page views.  Naturally, the newspaper would retain all the revenue from the advertisements placed on site.

While license fees are billed up front on an annual basis, revenue sharing provides an opportunity to offset that cost acreoss the year.

I have an e-mail in to Lewis with a number of questions related to the new revenue sharing options, and will post it as soon as he responds. In the meantime, any thoughts on the new structure?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Links to Check Out 01/13/2011

January 12, 2011 in industry news

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Why the O’Colly experiment is worthwhile

January 11, 2011 in blogging, innovation

Last week, I was interviewed by Marc Parry of the Chronicle of Higher Education’s technology blog for a story about the upcoming paywall at the O’Colly at Oklahoma State University.

You can read the article above, but I hope it comes through that I welcome the experimentation in new business models for college news, but don’t expect this particular experiment to be any sort of magic bullet.

I do think there will be a number of college newspapers looking at this experiment closely, and I hope the O’Collegian is open with the results.

Links to Check Out 01/07/2011

January 6, 2011 in industry news

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Links to Check Out 01/05/2011

January 4, 2011 in industry news

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Q&A: Rusty Lewis on CMN’s new business model

January 3, 2011 in College Media News, College Publisher, Content Management Systems, Media Companies - College Related

collegepublisherUPDATE: Additional questions appended after publication.

Editor’s note: These are the responses I received from College Media Network’s Rusty Lewis in response to questions I e-mailed him about their new business model/fee structure.

Since the announcement says that papers with an average of 25,000 page views/mo. will not be charged a fee, how many of your papers do you expect would be charged? What percentage of the total client list is that?

Approximately 100 CMN news sites are above the 25k threshold; this is about 20 percent of our network. We attempted to create several lower cost options for the publications with traffic below this mark, as we know many of them have limited resources.

When it comes to paying fees, there’s never a great time to implement such a change or make this sort of announcement. We understand many student publications use the spring and early summer to budget for the upcoming school year, so the start of the calendar year was as ideal as any time. This announcement allows CMN a full semester to explain and educate the market about the new options with enough time for publications to understand what they need to budget for in the coming school year.

What kind of feedback have you received since announcing the licensing fee?

While it feels like a sudden change, many of the publications or individuals we have reached out to expressed that this change makes sense In an industry full of semester- and year-based turnover, CMN’s success is largely due to the continuity our staff and services provide college media. We wanted to remain in existence, and so far our partners understand that desire.

That said, we have received a some very positive feedback in our efforts to provide multiple options/packages.

Today is actually the second wave of social activity. A CP partner tweeted the initial post within 12 hours of posting it to our site, and we saw an initial buzz for a few hours after that. Overall, though, a surprising amount of the conversation we’ve seen has taken place between people beyond the college media circuit.

Why the difference between the standard CMN/College Publisher package ($1995/yr) and the WordPress package ($4500/yr)?

College Publisher software relies on already existent infrastructure designed to share resources and provide streamlined support. This allows us to spread costs across the entire network. Our WP option is an individualized installation enabling the newspaper staff to customize their site (through themes and plug-ins) in ways network-based software can’t do as easily.

Will you charge $150/hour to support WordPress, and what sort of support is offered in the yearly plan?

The $4,500 annual license fee covers support related to CMN services related to server environment operation, DNS services and integration of CMN plug-ins. Many of the CMN plug-ins –advertising system, traffic reporting, city guide publisher, e-mail newsletter – power the core functions for a news site.

This support package does not include CMN digging into the custom code web editors write. If the site is experiencing failures, we will make sure that CMN plug-ins are not causing the error and then roll back to previous versions in order to isolate what is wrong.

CMN will be responsible for deploying WP core updates, which can be frequent, but are essential to assuring security and stability of the site. Compatibility development post-update for themes and plug-ins (non-CMN plug-ins) is solely the responsibility of the newspaper.

Any supplemental charges for support (at $150/hr) would be discussed and approved in writing in advance of any work being done. These charges would be limited to requests for review of custom code, design work or staff training.

Is there a cost associated with moving to WordPress on the CMN network? (i.e., from CP5 to WP on your system)

Data migration projects can vary from publication to publication so we are not setting a policy on costs for archives. CMN will tackle these requests on a case-by-case basis.

Will you assist in the site design for WordPress as a part of the yearly fee?

No. Our design services are available for our core platform, CP5.

What would be the advantage to having CPPro? ($8995/yr)

This system has dedicated resources (from a hardware, software and personnel standpoint.) A publication choosing this option can expect a high level of customization for any convergence type of project or newsroom work-flow situation. All customization would be unique to this instance (as opposed to CP5) and tailored to the specific needs of the news organization(s) on an ongoing basis.

Why was this announced Dec. 20, when most college media are on holiday break?

It was really simply an unfortunate byproduct of the way the calendar fell with regard to the new ownership of CMN. It took almost three months to fix, assess, plan and announce. The Access Network Co. felt it was the most responsible thing to announce plans for the CMN business as soon as they were finalized (as we would look to start implementing these changes early in 2011.)

The posting of this policy change on our site served as a reference point. In contacting our partners via phone and e-mail, we have somewhere to refer folks to dig into the details. When considering the alternative – “sitting” on the story until the New Year – we hope the news hounds out there understand the decision to post the information as soon as it was ready.

Beyond the business model, what is the overall vision here?

CMN is a collection of niche sites serving the college community. When we started, there was a great need for getting online quickly. We filled that need the best we could. In the previous decade, needs changed and spread to reflect the diversity that exists in college media.

This change is long overdue. College media is unique in that all of our partners serve the same purpose in their local markets, but they do it in a variety of ways. We needed to offer options and customization.

In order to provide college media with more services and more distribution channels, we needed to make tweaks to the business that allowed for client customization. Now, college newspapers can be a member of CMN and use one or all of our products.

This major change in our business model was always an internal discussion point, but only until the most recent change in ownership has the capability from an accounting perspective existed to make this adjustment possible. The Access Network Co. is a technology provider to publishers and brands – they have the infrastructure to help CMN navigate this change.

Innovation is essential to college media’s survival, and ultimately ours, too.

Our goal is allowing students and faculty to focus on storytelling and information dissemination. This doesn’t have to exclude the handful of students who have a passion for custom development. While this is a growing number of students, it’s not nearly a critical mass. We are looking to create an ecosystem that allows publications to experiment with that minority of student developers and easily transition to something else when those students move on.

Anything else you’d like to add that I haven’t asked about?

All of the prices and packages came from competitive analysis of various providers to the college market. When it came to pricing CP5 and CP Pro, we really took a look at the costs we are incurring to support and develop these systems to determine the price tag. We need to cover costs.

Our focus in 2011 is generating revenue, not just for us, but for our partners. The Access Network Co. is looking to create new revenue programs and hopefully get more digital advertising dollars to college media.

We thrive on feedback and sincerely want partners to let us know if they have any concerns or questions about this model change, our services or anything else related to our goals for 2011.

——— ADDITIONAL Q&A ———–

When did CMN begin looking at charging for the product?

This has been an idea kicked around for years going back to Y2M days. The issue was we never really had the infrastructure to execute this type of business model and client tracking. Investment was put off at several points in the past for a variety of reasons, but the economy definitely made our budgets lean (at least in recent history.)

How soon will this begin affecting existing customers?

We are contacting some newspapers now.

As stated in our communications, we are honoring all existing contracts. Our process involves giving 90 days advance notice to our partners that we are not renewing the existing agreements under the current terms. We have only just begun the process, but under the new set of options, we feel that newspapers will be getting more than they were under our older agreements.

How do you plan to get the word out to your partner news outlets?

We are using all the means at our disposal.

Collegepublisher.com is the hub of info newspapers can use for research and information gathering. We are beginning outreach via email and phone this week and will continue to do this all through the semester, prioritizing newspapers by the renewal date of their contract.

We definitely appreciate CICM for covering the story as it helps clear up any confusion. However, if a newspaper has any questions, we are available through email (support@collegepublisher.com) , phone (866.733.9231) and twitter (@collegepublish).

College Publisher changes business model

January 3, 2011 in College Media News, College Publisher

UPDATE: Interview with Rusty Lewis is now up here.

collegepublisher

Well, during my self-imposed exile from all things journalism related over the holidays, College Media Network dropped a bombshell.

Most notably, newspapers using CP5 under an Access Network affilate agreement will be invoiced  an annual payment* of $1,995 for the services rendered by CMN.  …

This cost is most attributable to user support and training.  There is an option to reduce this cost and be invoiced for training and design services as needed – click the pdf for details.

Any support or training would be billed at $150 per hour.  Support hours billed would relate to issues that resulted in user error and would be communicated in advance of invoicing.

*If a college publication averages over 25,000 page views per month, all of these fees are waived

They are also going to start hosting WordPress installations, and additional open-source CMS’s. There are additional details related to advertising splits at the link above. I have an e-mail in to Rusty Lewis at CMN to ask some followup questions, and I’ll be examining the pricing structure more in the next few days.

For now, it should be obvious that this is a game-changing move by College Publisher.

Enhanced by Zemanta