You are browsing the archive for 2010 March.

YouTube auto-captioning for video

March 9, 2010 in video

Several people have asked in the past about transcriptions/closed-captioning for video. It’s a pain in the butt, but YouTube has just rolled out a promising new time-saving feature called auto-captioning.

Like any machine-generated transcription, some words get garbled. But if you have a video that has good audio from an interview (external mics!), and there’s not a lot of background noise, it’s useful. You can also use it on videos that have already been uploaded to the service. In your account, under “Captions and Subtitles” download the
English machine transcription file (it will be named “captions.sbv”) and you can edit the transcript in a text editor like TextWrangler, then upload the file back up to YouTube.

You can see the results in this video:

I spent 10 minutes total figuring out how it worked, tweaking the .sbv file, and reuploading.

Pretty neat, I think

Here’s a deeper explanation in a TechCrunch story about some of the limitations.

Video example from boston.com

March 9, 2010 in video

I came across this story from the Boston Globe about an MIT student whos inventing a new type of wheelchair that is more usable in less wheelchair-accessible areas. The story itself is inspiring, the interactive graphic is interesting, but the video really tells the story of how it works, and illustrates some of the advantages of Internet-based video.

Students working with online video, note:

  • It’s short (1:44 minus title slide)
  • It’s told entirely by the subject of the story
  • It presents a single topic
  • There is a lot of b-roll footage (many close-ups)
  • The video matches the sound
  • It has a beginning, middle and end (i.e., explain the problem, how the solution was arrived at, demonstrate the solution)

There are lots of potential stories on your campus that could benefit from just this type of “how it works” video.

Blogging specific links

March 8, 2010 in blogging

links

Here are a few links to some “meta” discussion specifically about blogging – blogs about blogs – that I’ve come across recently. And all were recommended by one blogger.

They contain some excellent advice and tips if you are interested in the topic, or looking for ways to improve your own blogging skills.

Remarkablogger

Blog for Profit

Chris Garrett on New Media

Via John Haydon

Also, Problogger.net

Tagging & subcategories: organizing online content

March 4, 2010 in Tech Talk, Websites

A sample of a tag cloud

A sample of a tag cloud

A major problem with any news site is the search engine. If users have troubles locating a specific story that isn’t a few clicks away, chances are they won’t revisit your site.

So what’s the best way to please your visitors who want to find that story that never appeared on the front page? The answer is tags.

The second best search engine, Youtube, uses the system of tags. Look at any video, the more hits/pageviews, the more diverse the tags are. But tagging can be a time killer. Here are some steps you can take to save time on tagging and make your tags more efficient.

  • Have the writer come up with the tags. They will know the story best.
  • Have generic tags like “football” or “Politics” at your disposal.
  • Tag the categories the post falls in as well.
  • Tag the sources- if a visitor is looking for a specific quote, it will make that quote easier to find.
  • For multimedia have five or six generic tags like “video” or the name of your site.

A great example of a publication that tags well is The Whit Online. Check out some of their posts to see how it’s done.

Curious as to how your site looks as a cloud of tags? Check out some WordPress widgets that deliver tags in a flashy, user friendly view. Want to try out a single post, then just put in your posts URL here.

But tagging still takes time and getting your writers to sum up a story in 10-15 nouns can be nerve-wracking. Subcategories offer a little less efficiency than tags, but save time and set up a strong hierarchy.

If you don’t have the time or the patience to tag every single story that is posted to your news site, be as descriptive as possible with subcategories. Don’t just limit your category names to “Basketball.” If your site covers women’s and men’s teams, branch the subcategories farther out.

Remember,  Internet users like information at their fingertips. Both of these functionalities of WordPress offer this power, but if you have the time and the manpower, go with both.

links for 2010-03-04

March 4, 2010 in industry news

links

Inside Vandy pushes multimedia packages

March 2, 2010 in Flash, showcase

vandycityguide

Vanderbilt’s InsideVandy has been pushing the envelope recently in their online offerings. While they’ve been doing multimedia for a while, they are starting to package their efforts into more user-friendly experiences.

Check out these attractive packages: A City Guide, with restaurant reviews and an interactive map; a history of housing package with 360 panorama photographs from different dormatories; and a baseball season preview which features audio, statistics, and an interface similar to their basketball preview mentioned here earlier.

Check these packages out for inspiration. Are you doing something noteworthy online? Drop me an e-mail at scmurley -at- gmail.com and I’ll post about it.

Curley’s advice: Write well

March 1, 2010 in career talk, Conferences, hope for the future

Rob Curley (file photo)

Rob Curley (file photo)

Rob Curley spoke this weekend at the Associated Collegiate Press gathering in Phoenix. It was the first time he’s spoken in public in 18 months, he said. His keynote speech was interesting, but the better session was a Q&A that followed. During that time, he talked about some of the plans the Las Vegas Sun has for the future, and some of the ways they are leveraging a small staff (about 20 writers) to cover Las Vegas.

Toward the end, a student asked Curley how to best prepare for the future of journalism. Curley’s answer was interesting: Learn to write well.

You can listen to the full answer below. It’s about 4 minutes long.