<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video camera recommendations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2010/01/video-camera-recommendations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2010/01/video-camera-recommendations/</link>
	<description>a group discussion about the future of student media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleenflores</title>
		<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2010/01/video-camera-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-427364</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleenflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/?p=2672#comment-427364</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m considering the Sanyo Xacti.  It is only $160 but has no microphone/headphone inputs.  I want to get something inexpensive so that I can purchase at least four or five cameras and equipment (I could make a mojo kit for $250) to make them accessible for our students.  Has anyone used these or have any other suggestions.  I would rather get more students doing some basic multimedia than just one or two using the more expensive equipment.  Whenever a new student wants to use our more expensive equipment, I always shudder and hope they take care of it.  I was thinking that this route would encourage more experimentation and participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m considering the Sanyo Xacti.  It is only $160 but has no microphone/headphone inputs.  I want to get something inexpensive so that I can purchase at least four or five cameras and equipment (I could make a mojo kit for $250) to make them accessible for our students.  Has anyone used these or have any other suggestions.  I would rather get more students doing some basic multimedia than just one or two using the more expensive equipment.  Whenever a new student wants to use our more expensive equipment, I always shudder and hope they take care of it.  I was thinking that this route would encourage more experimentation and participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleenflores</title>
		<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2010/01/video-camera-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-426479</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleenflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/?p=2672#comment-426479</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m considering the Sanyo Xacti.  It is only $160 but has no microphone/headphone inputs.  I want to get something inexpensive so that I can purchase at least four or five cameras and equipment (I could make a mojo kit for $250) to make them accessible for our students.  Has anyone used these or have any other suggestions.  I would rather get more students doing some basic multimedia than just one or two using the more expensive equipment.  Whenever a new student wants to use our more expensive equipment, I always shudder and hope they take care of it.  I was thinking that this route would encourage more experimentation and participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m considering the Sanyo Xacti.  It is only $160 but has no microphone/headphone inputs.  I want to get something inexpensive so that I can purchase at least four or five cameras and equipment (I could make a mojo kit for $250) to make them accessible for our students.  Has anyone used these or have any other suggestions.  I would rather get more students doing some basic multimedia than just one or two using the more expensive equipment.  Whenever a new student wants to use our more expensive equipment, I always shudder and hope they take care of it.  I was thinking that this route would encourage more experimentation and participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleenflores</title>
		<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2010/01/video-camera-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-424800</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleenflores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/?p=2672#comment-424800</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m considering the Sanyo Xacti.  It is only $160 but has no microphone/headphone inputs.  I want to get something inexpensive so that I can purchase at least four or five cameras and equipment (I could make a mojo kit for $250) to make them accessible for our students.  Has anyone used these or have any other suggestions.  I would rather get more students doing some basic multimedia than just one or two using the more expensive equipment.  Whenever a new student wants to use our more expensive equipment, I always shudder and hope they take care of it.  I was thinking that this route would encourage more experimentation and participation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m considering the Sanyo Xacti.  It is only $160 but has no microphone/headphone inputs.  I want to get something inexpensive so that I can purchase at least four or five cameras and equipment (I could make a mojo kit for $250) to make them accessible for our students.  Has anyone used these or have any other suggestions.  I would rather get more students doing some basic multimedia than just one or two using the more expensive equipment.  Whenever a new student wants to use our more expensive equipment, I always shudder and hope they take care of it.  I was thinking that this route would encourage more experimentation and participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

