<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late to the carnival &#8230; trying to find the time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2008/05/late-to-the-carnival-trying-to-find-the-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2008/05/late-to-the-carnival-trying-to-find-the-time/</link>
	<description>a group discussion about the future of student media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica DaSilva</title>
		<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2008/05/late-to-the-carnival-trying-to-find-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-280055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica DaSilva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2008/05/26/late-to-the-carnival-trying-to-find-the-time/#comment-280055</guid>
		<description>I think people need to open their minds - especially those who are print-oriented. 
 
From my experience, the print staff has a hard time letting the online staff experiment. I think the online staff is almost getting used to having their ideas shot down.  
 
In the spring, there was a bit of controversy when the managing editor online said she wanted to post stories to Twitter right after the budget meeting. The editor said he didn&#039;t want the local paper to scoop us from our Twitter account. 
 
What he was overlooking is that the local paper can&#039;t scoop you if it&#039;s on your Web site - or your tweets - first! 
 
This lack of experiment or adventure will ultimately stunt a paper&#039;s Web-based growth and lower the online staff&#039;s morale, which would obviously be detrimental. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people need to open their minds &#8211; especially those who are print-oriented.</p>
<p>From my experience, the print staff has a hard time letting the online staff experiment. I think the online staff is almost getting used to having their ideas shot down. </p>
<p>In the spring, there was a bit of controversy when the managing editor online said she wanted to post stories to Twitter right after the budget meeting. The editor said he didn&#39;t want the local paper to scoop us from our Twitter account.</p>
<p>What he was overlooking is that the local paper can&#39;t scoop you if it&#39;s on your Web site &#8211; or your tweets &#8211; first!</p>
<p>This lack of experiment or adventure will ultimately stunt a paper&#39;s Web-based growth and lower the online staff&#39;s morale, which would obviously be detrimental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2008/05/late-to-the-carnival-trying-to-find-the-time/comment-page-1/#comment-264404</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2008/05/26/late-to-the-carnival-trying-to-find-the-time/#comment-264404</guid>
		<description>I think the single most important discussions that should be happening at the college media level is: &quot;what media are best suited to covering this story?&quot; 
 
Photos? Video? Live video? A straight story? Blogging? Live blogging? College media give young journalists an incredible opportunity to experiment with covering different stories with different media, and thus develop a feel for what works best and in what circumstances.  
 
If they miss this opportunity, and just emulate what they see traditional media doing, then journalism as a whole will be poorer. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the single most important discussions that should be happening at the college media level is: &quot;what media are best suited to covering this story?&quot;</p>
<p>Photos? Video? Live video? A straight story? Blogging? Live blogging? College media give young journalists an incredible opportunity to experiment with covering different stories with different media, and thus develop a feel for what works best and in what circumstances. </p>
<p>If they miss this opportunity, and just emulate what they see traditional media doing, then journalism as a whole will be poorer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

