Not my job? Journalists adjust to new roles
February 16, 2007 in industry news
Again proving the synchronicity that happens in the world of weblogs. Earlier this week I was talking to some college professors about an attitude that embraces new challenges, accepts new roles, and relishes the ability to expand talents. I basically said what I wrote when Gannett announced their “information center” initiative back in November: #
This is a new world for journalism, and some are going to be uncomfortable with the new roles they’ll have to adopt (â€Shoot video, you’ve got to be crazy!â€). But adaptation is the key to survival in this universe. As one of my doctoral advisers used to say, the worst thing you can say as a staffer is “that’s not my job.†#So it’s affirming to me to see Matt Waite remark about his role in a recent breaking news event (not my job doesn’t exist anymore in newspapers), and Ryan Sholin respond. #
Waite and Sholin are part of a new breed of journalists who are going to go far in this business because of their ability and willingness to adapt (I have quite a few of these folks in my RSS reader). #
When I mentioned this attitude to these college professors, one brought up the excellent question of newspaper unions. I admit that up to this point in my life, I’ve never worked in a “union shop” newspaper. But my step-father is a union electrician, so I grew up around unions. #
The union question is going to be an important one over the next few years. I hope union leaders and management don’t kill good newspaper operations over nitpicking job definitions (who writes headlines and who adjusts kerning). #
The young reporter I mentioned in my blog post said he's not allowed to shoot a photo due to union restrictions.
Note to unions: If you kill the newspapers, you won't have jobs.
Caveat: I've been a film-business union member for years, and understand the logic behind dividing labor. But if there were no electricians around, and I needed an extension cord, I knew how to get it myself and where to plug it in.